&
Advertise Here with Today.com
 

May 02 2009

Fined For Betting Reference

Published by mikevirgintino at 8:34 am under MLB Edit This

Baltimore reliever Jamie Walker has been fined by MLB critical comments made regarding umpire Angel Hernandez. Following an Orioles’ game with the Los Angeles Angels earlier this week, Walker made a reference to gambling.
“I don’t know if he had money betting on the game or what, but that’s a [bad] call,” Walker said about the balk called by Hernandez in the seventh inning. The call on Walker led up to Kendry Morales’ two-run double, which was the difference in the Angels 7-5 win.

“I don’t know if the guy has something against me or what, but no way … did I balk,” added Walker. “It changed the whole … game. I may get screwed in the long run, but that’s just unacceptable.”

MLB’s VP of on-field operations, Bob Watson, called Walker’s comments “inappropriate.” MLB wants to make sure there is no link between players, umpires and other personnel gambling on the outcome of games. Great, but two more points:

• Why wasn’t MLB and the Players’ Union this aggressive with steroids and human growth hormone? Why did it take them so long to confront the issues that it has tainted the integrity of the game for the last 20 years?
• Here’s hoping that the issue had to do with the reference to gambling and not a player’s criticism of an umpire. I didn’t see the call, so I don’t know if it was a balk or not. But a player should be able to have his say, in an appropriate and professional way, about a ruling on the field without MLB coming down on him.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
Possibly-related Articles:                                        (auto-generated)
Advertise Here with Today.com

One Response to “Fined For Betting Reference”

  1. therionon 02 May 2009 at 5:21 pm edit this

    It was a balk. But I disagree with the fine. He was just upset.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here
Some Today.com contributors may have received a fee or a promotional product or service from a manufacturer for promotional consideration, while others receive no consideration at all. Each contributor is responsible for disclosing any such promotional consideration.