I’ve waited for several days to pass for things to shake out before commenting on the calls made at the end of last week’s Los Angeles Angeles-Boston Red Sox game. I watched it on television when it happened and cannot believe the strike calls, or lack thereof, that were made during the Nick Green at-bat. The check swing is debatable. While I think he swung, and I called it as soon as I saw it, I had the close up look on TV. The umpire is more than 90 feet away, and I will give him the benefit of the doubt.
However, the ball four call that actually was a strike should be looked at closely by MLB.
Umpire Rick Reed acknowledged a day later that his ball-four call on a ninth-inning pitch by Angels closer Brian Fuentes to Green “very well could have been a strike.” He also admonished the Angels for their actions after the team’s 9-8 loss to the Boston Red Sox.
I understand that the umpires have to walk through the visiting team’s tunnel and clubhouse at Fenway Park before going through a door to their room. I can only imagine what they had to go through. But it is understandable. The umpires have blown obvious calls more often and are not consistent with the strike zone. They need to call the rule book strike zone.
Reed said that on the final pitch to Green, Mike Napoli’s actions led him to call it a ball after the Angels catcher tried to frame the knee-high pitch. (Sure, blame it on the catcher.)
Reed also said he had an earlier call on his mind — a call he confesses he might have missed. (So, make two bad calls.)
Just admit it, Reed, you blew the call, because you don’t have a consistent strike zone and can’t call the rule book strike.
“I saw the strike zone,” Reed said of the pitch to Green, referring to the telestrator box used on television replays. “That said it was a strike — it was a pitch I thought was borderline. The catcher did a nice job of bringing it up, and that was a telling blow. If a catcher moves his glove, it’s to improve the pitch.
“I called a [strike] earlier in the game that I thought was low, and I said, ‘I’m not going to let that happen again.’ I wish they were all waist-high. They’d be a lot easier to judge.”
Well, they aren’t easy. Go back to the rule book and call strikes as the rule book tells you to call strikes. Then, be consistent. That’s when players, managers and fans will not argue with you.
“Their deportment when we left the field left a lot to be desired,” said Reed, a 28-year veteran. “I was disappointed in the coaches. They’re the guys who usually stop friction during the game and afterward. They were an issue, and I’m not pleased in the way they said things or their presentation.”
Asked if it was the behavior of the coaches that left the worst taste in his mouth, Reed said, “Yes. Their behavior was unprofessional and unbecoming of a Major League Baseball team.”
Bottom line is that in many instance, from bad ball-strike calls, to bad positioning, to escalating arguments, to indifference, to arrogance, the umpires have gotten worse in recent years. MLB needs to reign them in. We talk about some of the things MLB can do in this blog’s “How To Improve MLB Umpiring” posts. More will be added to these posts soon.
Angels Manager Mike Scioscia strongly disagreed with Reed’s charge that the Angels were unprofessional.

“That’s absolutely wrong,” he said. “We had an emotional team. We respected their space. We gave them a buffer zone to go up [the tunnel] and all of us were upset, but there was nothing threatening.
“It was along the lines of, ‘You’ve got to be kidding me!’ A lot of it was not directed at them. Guys were venting. There was some profanity, but in an emotional game like that, there’s going to be some venting.”
Reed did not name the coaches, but did say Scioscia could have handled the situation better.
“Mike made an attempt to quiet the coaches down,” said Reed. “But he also made a comment that incited the situation.”
“I made a quiet comment to Rick Reed,” said Scioscia, “and that’s between me and him.”
Reed filed a report to the commissioner’s office after the game, and several Angels coaches and Scioscia are expected to receive fines and, possibly, suspensions.
Scioscia also spoke with MLB officials and pointed a finger at third base umpire Mark Wegner, who, according to Scioscia, came back to confront an Angels coach.
“If anything,” Scioscia said, “there is a little lesson of professionalism on Mark Wegner’s part that needs to be discussed.”
After the game, Scioscia and Fuentes were forceful in their criticisms of Reed and first base umpire Jeff Kellogg, who ruled that Green had checked his swing on an earlier two-strike pitch.
“What was the count at the end?” Scioscia fumed. “Three-and-four to Green?”
Fuentes said the umpires might have been swayed by the Fenway crowd and that there is a history of the Red Sox getting a hometown advantage.
“It’s frustrating, especially here and in other places where they seem a little timid to make a call,” Fuentes said. “It just seems like that’s the way it is here time and time again. . . . It’s either a mistake or they’re scared. It’s one of the two.”
Said Reed of these comments: “We read them, and we heard them. Do we wish to comment on them? I don’t think so.”
MLB can cut the frustration considerably but ordering the umpires to call the rule book strike zone. Umpires who don’t should be sent to the minors for seasoning (as players are sent down) and brought back when they have mastered the rule book zone, or, if it is a repeated failure, should be taken out of the rotation to umpire MLB games.
Now, about how the game ended: we can’t figure why Angel’s outfielder did not dive for the ball. But that is for other blogs to question.